Comments on: Human race will split into two races? Who believes this?

By: Weird Darryl

Weird Darryl — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 17:05:55 +0000

Will the “goblin-like” species be called “homo uglo”?
.

By: Oberhaensli R

Oberhaensli R — Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:37:38 +0000

This question cannot be answered because it doesn’t exist a ‘human race’ or ‘human races’, only ONE human SPECIES.

All humans are classified as belonging to the SPECIES ‘Homo sapiens sapiens’.

By: sugarbabe

sugarbabe — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:20:04 +0000

Fascinating, isn’t it? Just not very likely, in my opinion. Personal preferences are just that, personal, and what’s considered “sexy” changes from generation to generation. By today’s standards, Marilyn Monroe at 126 lbs, and very curvy, is considered “too fat” by today’s preferences.

And it seems that the liberal viewpoint that all lifestyles and philosophies are equal, will disappear when there are 2 classes–whatever happened to “we are all one race, the HUMAN race!” The struggle for human and equal rights will be tossed into the garbage heap? Isn’t creating a servant class a step backward? And how about those robots we were promised?

And why should there be a worker class when there will be machines, computers, and robots to do the menial and repetitive work? Shouldn’t scientific advances eliminate the need for a subservient class? Or is this a wish to become a royalty vs peasant society? Are we recreating the feudal period? Slavery?

I think Dr. Curry was sensationalizing his theory for the publicity-some of the things he’s proposing are illegal.

By: lexi

lexi — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:31:52 +0000

I read that article 2, i think scientists r running out of things to predict and now have to take off science fiction novels

By: disabled_usmc

disabled_usmc — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:13:05 +0000

I would doubt it but the eugenisists are out there, and conducting thier “Nazi” depopulation experiments. I’ve only actually seem this story on infowars.com or jonesreport.com.
If this isnt where you found this story check it out.

By: High Tide

High Tide — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:25:16 +0000

No this would not happen. Trends have shown that humans are become less distinct in the sense that there is no longer any significant source of allopatric speciation (i.e. human races no longer exist according to many biologists). Sympatric speciation is less common and would not be expected among a species like humans. For this trend to happen, there would need to be reproductive isolation between ugly people and beautiful people as well as smart people and dumb people and tall and short. It also assumes that men and women choose these attributes in fathers, not just in casual sexual relationships. Besides beutiful people are not always smart, rich, and tall. This is faulty logic. Dr. Curry’s arguments are surprisingly short sighted and ignore many obvious issues in evolution.

By: Brenda

Brenda — Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:29:40 +0000

That probably will happen, but not for a million more years.

By: Alex

Alex — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:52:19 +0000

I read the article as well and find it amussing to find a 112 year old theory return to headline news.

Some of the flaws of this theory include the falacy that the working class would choose uglier mates and that the pretty people (which the article refrences plastic surgery) would produce likelwise pretty people. If your a buck toothed flat chested girl with mousey hair …your kids will look like you .plastic surgery doent alter DNA.

The one statement made that i did find thought provoking is the racial blending idea. Like in matrix’s final city Zion…every natural born human was coffee colored from *********** breeding.

By: Justine

Justine — Wed, 20 Aug 2008 02:56:46 +0000

Whoever said that… must be pshyco… 4 real!

By: cfbjr4486

cfbjr4486 — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:05:10 +0000

I read that article too. I think it’s interesting, but I think Dr. Curry is taking a little bit of a leap looking that far into the future. He could be right and it all sounds very poosible but he’s looking really far ahead.