Dancing Belle asked:
Is war of the worlds science fiction or social commentary? What is the social commentary in it? WHat is the science fiction in it? I have a paper i have to write about this, any help or tips u can give would be greatly accepted! Thanks!
Could you guys show me how it can be both? Like give me examples of both? Thanks!
Randy
Is war of the worlds science fiction or social commentary? What is the social commentary in it? WHat is the science fiction in it? I have a paper i have to write about this, any help or tips u can give would be greatly accepted! Thanks!
Could you guys show me how it can be both? Like give me examples of both? Thanks!
Randy

Brian
It’s both:
The relevant part for you is in Part 2, but the whole speech is great.
Eileen
It’s both.
Researchers have noted the connection between Wells’ book and the sub-genre known as “invasion literature” which was very common in the West - and particularly in Britain - in the decades before the First World War, and which reflected the increasing feeling of anxiety and insecurity as international tensions escalated towards the coming war.
Most such books had plots concerned with human armies invading each other’s country, with British books mostly depicting German and/or French invading armies on British soil. Still, there were noted many plot similarities between Wells’ book and The Battle of Dorking (1871) by George Tomkyns Chesney: in both books, a ruthless enemy makes a devastating surprise attack, with the British armed forces helpless to stop its relentless advance; and both works contain many passages written in the author’s own voice which seem designed to try and shake Britons out of the complacent self-satisfaction of the Victorian age.
There are also similarities between Wells’ book and the widely successful The Great War in England in 1897 published four years earlier (1894) by William Le Queux, where an invading French army penetrates to the heart of London - though Le Queux’s book is written in a spirit of jingoistic nationalism opposite to Wells’ tone.
H.G. Wells was a strong supporter of the theory of evolution, and saw every species as being engaged in a constant, and often brutal struggle for survival. In the book, the Martian/mankind conflict is portrayed as a similar struggle, but on a larger scale. The book explores the morality inherent in social Darwinism, an ideology of some prominence at the time
The science fiction author Isaac Asimov argued that the book was intended as an indictment of European colonial actions in Africa, Asia, Australasia, and the Americas. In the mindset of the time, European technological superiority was seen as evidence of all-round superiority, and thus Europeans were more qualified to administer colonized regions than their native inhabitants. The novel challenges this perspective by conflating the justness of the Martian invasion with the colonial invasions made by European powers. Wells himself introduces this theme in the novel’s first chapter.
Animal rights activist David McKnight, writing in the November 2004 issue of Human and Animal Rights, noted that at least five vegetarians and animal rights activists known to him were substantially influenced to take their stance by reading Wells’s book, which vividly conveys human beings’ horror at becoming in effect the Martians’ food animals.
The War of the Worlds was also an episode of the American radio drama anthology series Mercury Theatre on the Air. It was performed as a Halloween episode of the series on October 30, 1938 and aired over the CBS Radio network. Directed and narrated by Orson Welles, the episode was an adaptation of H. G. Wells’ novel The War of the Worlds.
The first half of the 60-minute broadcast was presented as a series of simulated news bulletins, which suggested to many listeners that an actual Martian invasion was in progress. (Because the Mercury Theatre on the Air was a ’sustaining show’ [without sponsorship], the broadcast had no commercials). Some fled their homes; others were terrified. The news-bulletin format was decried as cruelly deceptive by some newspapers and public figures, leading to an outcry against the perpetrators of the broadcast, but the episode launched Welles to fame.
Welles’s adaptation is the most well-known radio dramatic productions in history. It was one of the Radio Project’s first studies.
Harvey
Most good science fiction is social commentary. Science fiction can be just a cheap background like the wild west, medieval times, English boarding schools, restoration period, etc.. The best science fiction takes inventions and ideas and devlopes them into entire worlds and cultures based upon those new ideas.
The reason science fiction is so often used to make social commentary is that it allows the author and the reader to suspend preconceived notions and biases and examine certain facets of the problem. It’s a lot easier to explore the idea of whether political power should be centralized or diverse, if you don’t drag slavery into it (TV’s FIrefly). It’s a lot easier to explore the idea of sexuality, if you’re dealing with an alien race, rather having to debate ********** as part of being *** (Le Guin’s Left Hand of Darkness.) Race hatred? Everyone remembers the episode of Star Trek where the half black, half white man is locked in battle with the half white, half black man.
Your question is asking for a binary answer to a a non binary question.