<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: do you think the idea of turning the old black n white science fiction and monster films is such a good idea?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historyofsciencefiction.com/movies/do-you-think-the-idea-of-turning-the-old-black-n-white-science-fiction-and-monster-films-is-such-a-good-idea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historyofsciencefiction.com/movies/do-you-think-the-idea-of-turning-the-old-black-n-white-science-fiction-and-monster-films-is-such-a-good-idea/</link>
	<description>Want to know the history of SciFi?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 13:40:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: squeakyweal</title>
		<link>http://www.historyofsciencefiction.com/movies/do-you-think-the-idea-of-turning-the-old-black-n-white-science-fiction-and-monster-films-is-such-a-good-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>squeakyweal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historyofsciencefiction.com/movies/do-you-think-the-idea-of-turning-the-old-black-n-white-science-fiction-and-monster-films-is-such-a-good-idea/#comment-132</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a big b/w fan.  Classic horror flicks, and especially film noir mysteries depended on light and shadow for mood, and using shadow for depth has become a lost art.  King Kong wasn&#039;t just a classic &quot;horror&quot; movie.  The special effects and camera techniques were groundbreaking.  The camera developed for King Kong (by Ray Harryhausen) was a piece of technology that moved filmaking in a whole new direction.  Until then, you were just telling a story.  After King Kong, you were entertained by not just the story, but the way it was put on film.  In my opinion, KONG was the moment that film became art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a big b/w fan.  Classic horror flicks, and especially film noir mysteries depended on light and shadow for mood, and using shadow for depth has become a lost art.  King Kong wasn&#8217;t just a classic &#8220;horror&#8221; movie.  The special effects and camera techniques were groundbreaking.  The camera developed for King Kong (by Ray Harryhausen) was a piece of technology that moved filmaking in a whole new direction.  Until then, you were just telling a story.  After King Kong, you were entertained by not just the story, but the way it was put on film.  In my opinion, KONG was the moment that film became art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FAshionPassion</title>
		<link>http://www.historyofsciencefiction.com/movies/do-you-think-the-idea-of-turning-the-old-black-n-white-science-fiction-and-monster-films-is-such-a-good-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>FAshionPassion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historyofsciencefiction.com/movies/do-you-think-the-idea-of-turning-the-old-black-n-white-science-fiction-and-monster-films-is-such-a-good-idea/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>I agree, you&#039;re talking about turning the original black and white into color right. So yeah i agree. I loved the older grainier version of Wizard of Oz because it looked real. Now seeing the colored part of the movie on dvd, it&#039;s obvious they were on a set in a big warehouse. Some shots I can make out the corners of the roof.

Now some peopel I see are confused with your question, if you are referring to remaking and doing new versions of them now then i disagree, i liked King Kong though I can see how people thought of it as ******. 

They&#039;re doing the original WolfMan and I saw the new teaser picture in Entertainment Weekly with Vinnicio Del Toro or whatever his name is and that picture LOOKS WICKED. but i don&#039;t know what they&#039;re gonna do with it. He&#039;s gonna have to be a more vicous savage wolfman so PG-13 rating or R rating</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, you&#8217;re talking about turning the original black and white into color right. So yeah i agree. I loved the older grainier version of Wizard of Oz because it looked real. Now seeing the colored part of the movie on dvd, it&#8217;s obvious they were on a set in a big warehouse. Some shots I can make out the corners of the roof.</p>
<p>Now some peopel I see are confused with your question, if you are referring to remaking and doing new versions of them now then i disagree, i liked King Kong though I can see how people thought of it as ******. </p>
<p>They&#8217;re doing the original WolfMan and I saw the new teaser picture in Entertainment Weekly with Vinnicio Del Toro or whatever his name is and that picture LOOKS WICKED. but i don&#8217;t know what they&#8217;re gonna do with it. He&#8217;s gonna have to be a more vicous savage wolfman so PG-13 rating or R rating</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajanabel</title>
		<link>http://www.historyofsciencefiction.com/movies/do-you-think-the-idea-of-turning-the-old-black-n-white-science-fiction-and-monster-films-is-such-a-good-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>ajanabel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historyofsciencefiction.com/movies/do-you-think-the-idea-of-turning-the-old-black-n-white-science-fiction-and-monster-films-is-such-a-good-idea/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>No, I don&#039;t.  They are classics - leave them as such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I don&#8217;t.  They are classics &#8211; leave them as such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Galaxy's Best Pilot</title>
		<link>http://www.historyofsciencefiction.com/movies/do-you-think-the-idea-of-turning-the-old-black-n-white-science-fiction-and-monster-films-is-such-a-good-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Galaxy's Best Pilot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 05:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historyofsciencefiction.com/movies/do-you-think-the-idea-of-turning-the-old-black-n-white-science-fiction-and-monster-films-is-such-a-good-idea/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>No, not at all. Peter Jackson&#039;s version of King Kong was three-hours worth of crap. When they make a colorized version of these films, they lose something in the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, not at all. Peter Jackson&#8217;s version of King Kong was three-hours worth of crap. When they make a colorized version of these films, they lose something in the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

