<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is the least science-based science fiction movie you have saw?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historyofsciencefiction.com/movies/what-is-the-least-science-based-science-fiction-movie-you-have-saw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historyofsciencefiction.com/movies/what-is-the-least-science-based-science-fiction-movie-you-have-saw/</link>
	<description>Want to know the history of SciFi?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 13:40:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: marbehraglaim</title>
		<link>http://www.historyofsciencefiction.com/movies/what-is-the-least-science-based-science-fiction-movie-you-have-saw/comment-page-1/#comment-764</link>
		<dc:creator>marbehraglaim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historyofsciencefiction.com/movies/what-is-the-least-science-based-science-fiction-movie-you-have-saw/#comment-764</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;&quot;&gt;Darlene&lt;/a&gt;


The Star Wars series has always been pretty unabashedly unscientific. Spaceships going &quot;whoosh&quot; in the vacuum of outer space? A giant worm with teeth living on an asteroid? Dozens of planets with humanly breathable air and humanoid aliens? I haven&#039;t even gotten into &quot;the Force.&quot; None of this, of course, is to criticize Star Wars, which was never intended to be anything more than a space opera. But I definitely would not call it &quot;science-based.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="">Darlene</a></p>
<p>The Star Wars series has always been pretty unabashedly unscientific. Spaceships going &#8220;whoosh&#8221; in the vacuum of outer space? A giant worm with teeth living on an asteroid? Dozens of planets with humanly breathable air and humanoid aliens? I haven&#8217;t even gotten into &#8220;the Force.&#8221; None of this, of course, is to criticize Star Wars, which was never intended to be anything more than a space opera. But I definitely would not call it &#8220;science-based.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

